Comments on: Testing events with unit tests http://www.hedgate.net/articles/2007/03/13/testing-events-with-unit-tests/ Contextual Chameleon Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:53:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: chrishedgate http://www.hedgate.net/articles/2007/03/13/testing-events-with-unit-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-6392 chrishedgate Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:23:48 +0000 #comment-6392 Seth, I am not quite sure what you mean. In the example above there are two real types, SubscriberUnderTest and PublisherUnderTest. The tests verify functionality in those two types, only. The fakes are used as stubs and spies to drive and verify the behavior of the real types. Do you see things differently? Seth, I am not quite sure what you mean. In the example above there are two real types, SubscriberUnderTest and PublisherUnderTest. The tests verify functionality in those two types, only. The fakes are used as stubs and spies to drive and verify the behavior of the real types. Do you see things differently?

]]> By: Seth Flowers http://www.hedgate.net/articles/2007/03/13/testing-events-with-unit-tests/comment-page-1/#comment-6391 Seth Flowers Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:52:51 +0000 #comment-6391 Whats the point of unit testing _only_ mock objects. I expect to see at least one real type being tested, the rest being mocks and interfaces that the mocks implement. If all the code is in mock objects, the test is worthless.<br><br>Sandimashighschoolfootballrules Whats the point of unit testing _only_ mock objects. I expect to see at least one real type being tested, the rest being mocks and interfaces that the mocks implement. If all the code is in mock objects, the test is worthless.

Sandimashighschoolfootballrules

]]>